Ha. Fine. I didn’t know how much of a story you wanted.
I did undergraduate physics with a theoretical specialization. But have spent most of my time subsequently thinking about computational linguistics.
I wouldn’t like to think it is a hammer making every problem a nail, but as a study of the underlying properties of the world physics does seem to have broad applicability.
On your intuition, I can give you a lot.
First a presentation of my own from some years ago along the same lines:
http://www.academia.edu/1692943/Wave_Linguistics (sorry academia.edu can be intrusive to access, write if you want it sent separately.)
Then the “Quantum Interaction” community, who had a conference for a few years, perhaps still:
And more, and better. My current angle is that an understanding of some distributional properties suggests nice answers for a model to go beneath quantum mechanics. Certainly it seems to be a general thing for assemblies to display “quantum” properties.
So I go somewhat the opposite way to the Quantum Interaction community. I think actually the mind may not require too much work. However the expansion of that simplicity can obviously be very rich. And accessing the simplicity does require a different understanding of the relationship between complexity and simplicity. Which a knowledge of some of the insights of things like wave equations can help with, yes.
By all means I’d be happy to look at anything you’ve done in the area.
Re. my project. I’ve made A LOT of progress myself just this last week. I was actually verging on changing and going to “stealth” with it. Because I think it has a lot of potential, and I’m not sure if open collaboration is the right model in the short term.
But I do welcome collaboration from someone with the right skills. Perhaps with an NDA, at this stage. Just to see how things pan out with this latest development.